First of all, the flight logs all show Asiana 214 as having landed
safely. I am highly suspicious of that plane crash. There is another
problem - the plane that crashed was a 777 300, and the Asiana flight to
San Francisco is supposed to be a 777 200. Big problem there. The main
difference is that the 777 300 has an additional 2,000 mile flight
range. I had initially expected Asiana to be using a 777 300 on the San
Francisco route, but later found out that they use a 777 200. Now in the
media, the confusion is obvious, with people who know planes
identifying the crash as a 300, but people who know the type Asiana
actually uses being a 200. So all over the media, there are different
planes being stated as crashed, because a 300 crashed and a 200 is what
Asiana uses. I still think the plane that crashed in San Francisco was
probably supposed to go to Australia and got remote hijacked and flown
to a crash by a desk bound idiot flying it like a drone. This would
explain the military response and the FBI debriefing of all passengers.
I still think Snowden was on that plane, and there are plenty of reasons for it, which are:
On July 5th, Russia announced that Snowden had ONE DAY to leave the
airport or he was going to get extradited to the U.S. WHAT HAPPENED TO
THAT, and why is Russia playing nice now, well over a week later? Last I
heard before that crash was that Snowden was on his way to Venezuela.
Add to this -
After the plane crash, Snowden started talking about UFO's and Chem
Trails. That may fly in the alternative media, but for a huge number of
people those are kooky subjects, and aliens are the FIRST subject
intelligence agencies use to cast doubt on the credibility of anyone if
they can get away with it. Chem trails are an additional step off the
deep end for many people, and the NSA does absolutely NOTHING with
aliens, UFO's or Chem trails. Snowden would not know jack about those
subjects from ANY experience with the NSA.
Another thing that made me suspicious was Snowden's composure in the
latest videos. He is not acting right, nor does he look right. In the
latest videos he has absolutely NONE of the composure you would expect
from anyone working intelligence. You also never really get a clear look
at more than his face, and though the videos are more clear than the
osama videos they still come off like one of those stupid Osama bin
laden videos, or that Iraqi Berg beheading video that was so obviously
fake. I don't buy it AT ALL. If we are seeing the real Snowden in the
latest videos, I believe they are likely being shot in the U.S. after
his capture, with him being drugged, under mind control and not even
knowing where he is.
The tipping point came when what I believe is now "Snowden" said
that Stuxnet was written by the NSA. Folks, THAT is a load of B.S. like
no other. The NSA is a totally non aggressive agency which would not
write an attack virus, that would be handled by Darpa and the CIA. And
the initial reports about Stuxnet never mentioned the NSA AT ALL.Article continues at the tap
No comments:
Post a Comment