Thursday, January 10, 2013
The Real Reason They Want Your Guns
If you wanted to take the rights away from the people of a nation, like the United States of America, you could do so to a certain point, even with the populace being armed.
But, at a certain point down the road to taking rights away, you had better disarm the people or they won't take it, they will resist.
A lot of the rights were given up do to "terrorist attacks" like 9-11 even though anyone with half a brain in their head knows it was an inside job.
So how do you take more rights away?
Well, since the populace is armed, you really can't, without causing an armed backlash.
So the obstacle to taking away more rights becomes the guns.
How do you get their guns?
Stage/plan attacks using guns.
The same idiots that believe the 9-11 lie will believe this one too.
And the even more stupid will not only turn in their guns, but want others to do the same.
If the idiots win out, you can take away any right that you want to.
What are they going to do about it?
Nothing, because they are disarmed.
Now you can take whatever you want from them, their food, their house, their kids, whatever strikes your fancy.
But, at a certain point down the road to taking rights away, you had better disarm the people or they won't take it, they will resist.
A lot of the rights were given up do to "terrorist attacks" like 9-11 even though anyone with half a brain in their head knows it was an inside job.
So how do you take more rights away?
Well, since the populace is armed, you really can't, without causing an armed backlash.
So the obstacle to taking away more rights becomes the guns.
How do you get their guns?
Stage/plan attacks using guns.
The same idiots that believe the 9-11 lie will believe this one too.
And the even more stupid will not only turn in their guns, but want others to do the same.
If the idiots win out, you can take away any right that you want to.
What are they going to do about it?
Nothing, because they are disarmed.
Now you can take whatever you want from them, their food, their house, their kids, whatever strikes your fancy.
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
Retired Admiral Makes Stunning Accusation. Benghazi-Gate Is The Treasonous And Impeachable Criminal Enterprise That Can Bring Barack Obama Down.
It’s even worse that we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that
Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes:
“[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.”
Although the Obama Regime intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former
Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…
and the attackers, believing that the Obama Regime had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
• What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
• Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
• What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?
• Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
• Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
• Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?
*Will Hillary "Blood Clot" Clinton ever testify on Benghazi? (This question added by Texlahoma.)
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger criminal enterprise… an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists [and] self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
And treason is an impeachable offense. Congress has the power and constitutional authority to get to the bottom of this mess… and we’re going to see to it that they do their constitutional duty.
More Here
It is undoubtedly worse than Obama simply turned his back on cornered American citizens in a foreign land, knowing undoubtedly they would die. But that Barack did so without any compelling reason—except political—is beyond evil. Only a moral monster would have made that decision when it was within his powers to possibly save them with almost no effort of his own.
And Here
Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes:
“[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.”
Although the Obama Regime intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former
Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…
and the attackers, believing that the Obama Regime had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
• What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
• Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
• What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?
• Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
• Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
• Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?
*Will Hillary "Blood Clot" Clinton ever testify on Benghazi? (This question added by Texlahoma.)
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger criminal enterprise… an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists [and] self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
And treason is an impeachable offense. Congress has the power and constitutional authority to get to the bottom of this mess… and we’re going to see to it that they do their constitutional duty.
More Here
It is undoubtedly worse than Obama simply turned his back on cornered American citizens in a foreign land, knowing undoubtedly they would die. But that Barack did so without any compelling reason—except political—is beyond evil. Only a moral monster would have made that decision when it was within his powers to possibly save them with almost no effort of his own.
And Here
Tuesday, January 08, 2013
Professor Questions Newtown Shooting: Says That Crisis Actors Played Roles
Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:45
Well what have we here? It now seems that ‘conspiracy theorists’ aren’t the only ones questioning the legitimacy of the school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. A communications professor at Florida Atlantic University has stirred up a hornets nest by claiming that ‘crisis actors’ were involved in this false flag event motivated by a political agenda of disarming Americans and instituting a ‘one world’ government. This story can be read in its’ entirety @ http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/palm-beach/fl-fau-prof-newtown-20130107,0,4267958.story
A communication professor known for conspiracy theories has stirred controversary at Florida Atlantic University with claims that last month’s Newtown, Conn., school shootings did not happen as reported — or may not have happened at all.
Moreover, James Tracy asserts in radio interviews and on his memoryholeblog.com. that trained “crisis actors” may have been employed by the Obama administration in an effort to shape public opinion in favor of the event’s true purpose: gun control.
“As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers, there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends,” writes Tracy, a tenured associate professor of media history at FAU and a former union leader.
For everyone who still thinks that the ‘conspiracy theorists’ are crazy, please watch this video and let me know what you think. Crisis actors? We’ve gotten nothing but lies from TPTB and the mainstream media on this one. What ARE THEY covering up?
More Here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
