It’s even worse that we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that
Barack Obama
intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack
and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes:
“[T]he
attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a
bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner
exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman,
the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.”
Although the Obama Regime intentionally gutted security at the
consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former
Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods
and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American
lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…
and the
attackers, believing that the Obama Regime had betrayed them, tortured
Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
•
What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent
Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed
“revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
• Did that half-baked scheme
to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in
Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have
suggested?
• What was actually going on
at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a
“consulate” despite establishment media claims?
• Was Ambassador Stevens
recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian
regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing
body of credible evidence suggests?
• Why did the administration
claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube
video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
• Was the lack of security
at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the
lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional
“regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?
*Will Hillary "Blood Clot" Clinton ever testify on Benghazi? (This question added by Texlahoma.)
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger criminal enterprise… an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists [and] self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
And treason
is an impeachable offense. Congress has the power and constitutional
authority to get to the bottom of this mess… and we’re going to see to
it that they do their constitutional duty.
More Here
It is undoubtedly worse than Obama simply turned his back on cornered
American citizens in a foreign land, knowing undoubtedly they would die.
But that Barack did so without any compelling reason—except
political—is beyond evil. Only a moral monster would have made that
decision when it was within his powers to possibly save them with almost
no effort of his own.
And Here
Regarding the claim that retired four star admiral James Lyons said that Obama conspired with enemies.
ReplyDeleteYou said: “The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
HOWEVER. It turns out that the Washington Examiner had no such article. It never even interviewed Admiral Lyons.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/search?search=admiral+lyons#.UPB24_KtmvA
There IS an article by Admiral Lyons in the Washington TIMES (perhaps you got the two mixed up). HOWEVER, while the article talks a lot about mistakes by the administration, it does NOT claim that Obama conspired with enemies to stage a mock attack that went horribly wrong—-or that he conspired with enemies at all. There is NO mention of conspiracy in the article. (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/28/lyonsobama-needs-come-clean-what-happened-benghazi/?page=all)
A blog known as The Examiner (which is not the Washington Examiner) did say that “Sources suggest the Benghazi attack was a bungled abduction attempt (Photos)”. And it quoted Admiral Lyons in a TV interview, but it did not say that Lyons said: ““[T]he attack on the
American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
Lyons did NOT say it, and the Blog “the Examiner” quotes its unknown
and untested sources saying that it MAY have happened, not that it did happen. (http://www.examiner.com/article/some-sources-suggest-the-benghazi-attack-was-a-bungled-abduction-attempt).
And yet birthers and the birther press believe such stories.