MILITARY INSIDER: President Obama – “By Any Means Necessary”

by Ulsterman on July 19, 2012

For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”.  What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”.  For those who have followed  these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be.  Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.

PART ONE:

UM:  Can we begin?
WSI:  (Broad smile)  Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.

UM:  I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better.  Out of the woods?
WSI:  No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will.  But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet!  (laughs)

 UM:  Why did you decide to invite him here?  I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?

WSI:  Certainly.  I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person.  I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.
UM:  How long have you known each other?
WSI:  (Looks over at MI)  That would be…nearly twenty years?  Perhaps a bit more?
MI:  Twenty three years.
WSI:  That long?  Really?
MI:  Just over twenty-three years.  That’s correct.
UM:  Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
MI:  No.
WSI:  I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago.  Shortly after the election…in 2008.  Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made.  That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake.  Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.
UM:  Can you expand on that?  Those concerns.  What were they?
WSI:  You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path.  A number of times.
UM:  I’d like to hear it from him.  If that’s ok.  Their perspective.  Unfiltered.  Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI)
WSI:  If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine.  But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was.  I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.
UM:  We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right?  So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then.  After 2008.  Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.
MI:  There were.
UM:  Concerns?  Before 2008?  About Obama?
MI:  Yes.
UM:  What were they?
MI:  The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military.  That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us.   At least those of us not put in place by the communists.  The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.
UM:  Did you just say communists?  In the U.S. military?
MI:  Yes.
UM:  Please – can you please explain that.
MI:  Communists.  Communist supporters.  Sympathizers.  Or socialists.  Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term.  Big government…One World…that whole concept.  It’s real.  As real these chairs.  That wall.  The air in your lungs.

UM:  Agenda 21?  That conspiracy theory?  And the United States military?
MI:  Yes – not a conspiracy.  It’s real.  It exists.  And it’s happening right now.
UM:  Agenda 21 is non-binding.
MI:  That is…not accurate.
UM:  No – it’s a non-binding agreement.  It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.
MI:  No sir.  You are wrong.  Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.
UM:  What?
MI: Non-binding.  Voluntary.
UM:  But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.
MI:  It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.
UM:  What?
MI:  That document was a blueprint.  Have you actually read it?
UM:  Not…not all of it.  No.
MI:  Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?
UM:  I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.
MI:  That’s not what I said.
UM:  You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.
MI: No.
UM:  Ok…you explain to me what you just said.  About the communists, the globalists…all of that.  What did you say?
MI:  You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama?  Before the 2008 election.
UM:  Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists.  That’s what you said.  Right?
MI:  Yes.
UM:  So – what’s the problem?
MI:  What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military.  You said that.  Not me.

UM:  What’s the difference?
MI:  Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military.  They are not running the U.S. military.  That is a distinction of epic proportions.  You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.
WSI:  And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time.  It’s been happening right under our noses.
UM:  It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?
MI:  Incorrect.
UM:  What?
MI:  Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era.  It was developed long before that.  In fact, it culminated under President Bush.  HW.
WSI:  But it goes back much farther than that.  I only learned of this more recently myself.
MI: Yes sir – much farther.  Decades of planning.  A multiple series of five year plans.
UM:  Five year plans?
WSI:  Just like Stalin.  A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments.  Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.
MI:  Yes sir.  Just like that.
UM:  So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?
MI:  You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.
UM:  Fair enough – I apologize for that.
MI:  Accepted.
WSI:  He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were.  Please – continue.
MI:  Yes sir.
(Pause)
Decades ago.  The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s.  The birth of the modern environmental movement.  Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.
Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been member
 s of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications.  These people are not conspiracy nuts.  These people are patriots who understand the threat.  The country – the United  States, is under siege.  It has been going on for a long time.  Decades of planning.  And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage.  Right now.  It’s happening now.
WSI:  And you are absolutely convinced of that?  It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal?  Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time?  Fully commenced?  Right?
MI:  Yes sir.
UM:  How?  (Pause)  The…implementation?  How does that work.  By force?  Using our own military against us?
MI:  No.  That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women.  They signed up.  They took an oath.  And they are doing their job.  Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement.  Not all.  Not most.  But some.


UM:  But some of these inside the military – they have influence?
MI:  Yes.  Appointed to positions of authority.  By this administration.
UM:  The Secretary of State?  Panetta?  I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?



MI:  He acted outside his direct authority.  That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United  States.
UM:  What do you mean?
MI: (Looks toward WSI)
UM:  (Repeats question) What do you mean?
WSI:  What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to.  The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-.  It means nothing to me.  Nothing.
UM:  So you don’t trust him?


WSI:  No – I do not.  I’ve never trusted any of them.
UM:  Who?
WSI:  Politicians.  That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election.  I find them all distasteful to some degree.  Even the best of them.
UM:  But you’re voting this time – in 2012.
WSI:  That’s correct.  While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.
UM:  And what’s that?
WSI:  Dangerous.
UM:  So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…
WSI:  Crazy?
UM:  Yeah – crazy.
WSI: That’s how it’s intended.  Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work.  Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.
These Obama people are quite good at that.

Interview continues at theulstermanreport.com